Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Cold-formed structural steel hollow sections (TIBNOR (SE)) (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Reference year 2025
Name
Cold-formed structural steel hollow sections (TIBNOR (SE))
Technical purpose of product or process The primary intended use of hot-finished structural hollow sections (HFSHS) is as a high-performance structural component in various engineering and construction sectors. These products are manufactured to provide a high strength-to-weight ratio and superior resistance to torsional (twisting) forces compared to open profiles like H-beams or I-beams.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • One Click LCA: Material / Metal / Structural Steel
General comment on data set The starting format for manufacture of steel hollow profiles is mostly a coil of hot-rolled strip. The strip is de-coiled and after surface preparation, it is cut to an appropriate width, formed by bending to a round, square or rectangular shape and then welded longitudinally. The shaping operation can be performed either cold or on strip which has been heated. The procedure is carried out in a continuous line, the final operation being cutting to length. Hot-formed profiles have lower internal stresses than cold-formed which means that there is less risk for shape changes if they are cut, machined or welded. The principal advantages of cold-formed profiles are better dimensional tolerances and surface finish. Hollow profiles, especially those with square or rectangular section, are used as a complement to beam profiles in building construction and civil engineering. Compared with H- and I-beam profiles and U-channels, the closed shape of hollow profiles means that, for a given cross-sectional area, they have much better resistance to twisting. The steel grades used for cold- and hot-formed hollow profiles are most often weldable, low-carbon constructional steels with an iron content of 98% or more. As with other steel products, hollow profiles used in building and civil engineering constructions can at the end of their useful life be recovered and recycled to 100%.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Material properties of the reference flow
    • weight per piece: 1.0 kg
    • gross density: 7850.0 kg/m^3
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system The starting format for manufacture of steel hollow profiles is mostly a coil of hot-rolled strip. The strip is de-coiled and after surface preparation, it is cut to an appropriate width, formed by bending to a round, square or rectangular shape and then welded longitudinally. The shaping operation can be performed either cold or on strip which has been heated. The procedure is carried out in a continuous line, the final operation being cutting to length. Hot-formed profiles have lower internal stresses than cold-formed which means that there is less risk for shape changes if they are cut, machined or welded. The principal advantages of cold-formed profiles are better dimensional tolerances and surface finish. Hollow profiles, especially those with square or rectangular section, are used as a complement to beam profiles in building construction and civil engineering. Compared with H- and I-beam profiles and U-channels, the closed shape of hollow profiles means that, for a given cross-sectional area, they have much better resistance to twisting. The steel grades used for cold- and hot-formed hollow profiles are most often weldable, low-carbon constructional steels with an iron content of 98% or more. As with other steel products, hollow profiles used in building and civil engineering constructions can at the end of their useful life be recovered and recycled to 100%.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Use
B1
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 1.24
  • 0.014
  • -0.0367
  • ND
  • 0.000299
  • 0.000935
  • 0.0498
  • 0.0000148
  • -0.396
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • ND
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0201
Input
  • 1.24
  • 0.014
  • -0.0367
  • ND
  • 0.000299
  • 0.000935
  • 0.0498
  • 0.0000148
  • -0.3759
Input
  • 28.8
  • 0.801
  • 0.00101
  • ND
  • 0.0472
  • 0.0534
  • 0.267
  • 0.00153
  • -6.78
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • ND
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0068
Input
  • 28.8
  • 0.801
  • 0.00101
  • ND
  • 0.0472
  • 0.0534
  • 0.267
  • 0.00153
  • -6.773
Input
  • 0.0293
  • 0.000372
  • 7.13E-7
  • ND
  • 0.0000196
  • 0.0000248
  • 0.000326
  • 3.85E-7
  • 0.409
Input
  • 0.00000943
  • 0.0000047
  • 6.99E-9
  • ND
  • 5.12E-8
  • 3.14E-7
  • 0.0000151
  • 7.97E-9
  • -0.0000612
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • ND
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.000517
  • 0.000109
  • -0.0000032
  • ND
  • 0.00000312
  • 0.00000728
  • 0.000142
  • 0.00000159
  • -0.00167
Output
  • 0.0191
  • 0.00116
  • 0.00000738
  • ND
  • 0.0000525
  • 0.0000776
  • 0.00174
  • 0.00000169
  • -0.246
Output
  • 0.17
  • 0.0246
  • 0.00555
  • ND
  • 0.000715
  • 0.00164
  • 0.063
  • 0.0000387
  • -1.92
Output
  • 0.00023
  • 2.57E-7
  • 7.22E-10
  • ND
  • 5.12E-9
  • 1.71E-8
  • 5.8E-7
  • 2.35E-10
  • 0.00000697
Output
  • 0.000213
  • 0
  • 0
  • ND
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.11
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.0709
  • 0
  • 0.0008
  • ND
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.88
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00117
  • 0
  • 0
  • ND
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00023
  • 0
  • 0.004
  • ND
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0023
  • ND
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Use
B1
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
  • 28.6
  • 0.801
  • 0.00101
  • ND
  • 0.0472
  • 0.0534
  • 0.267
  • 0.00153
  • -6.78
  • 0.00000414
  • 1.9E-7
  • 1.82E-10
  • ND
  • 1.29E-9
  • 1.26E-8
  • 0.00000141
  • 9.92E-11
  • -0.00000719
  • 0.00696
  • 0.000118
  • 4.28E-7
  • ND
  • 0.0000325
  • 0.0000079
  • 0.000237
  • 4.43E-7
  • -0.00295
  • 6.41E-9
  • 1.13E-9
  • 1.12E-12
  • ND
  • 5.52E-11
  • 7.55E-11
  • 2.67E-10
  • 1.81E-12
  • -2.47E-9
  • 0.0000181
  • 0.00000383
  • 2.17E-8
  • ND
  • 1.04E-7
  • 2.56E-7
  • 0.0000128
  • 5.13E-9
  • -0.00032
  • 0.00175
  • 0.0000285
  • 4.91E-7
  • ND
  • 0.0000151
  • 0.0000019
  • 0.0000524
  • 1.69E-7
  • -0.000655
  • 0.0188
  • 0.000307
  • 0.00000176
  • ND
  • 0.000165
  • 0.0000205
  • 0.000592
  • 0.00000184
  • -0.00718
  • -0.00675
  • 0.0000114
  • 0
  • ND
  • 3.68E-7
  • 7.63E-7
  • -0.0000422
  • -1.99E-8
  • 0.00249
  • 2.5
  • 0.0569
  • 0.0000708
  • ND
  • 0.0036
  • 0.0038
  • 0.0199
  • 0.0000624
  • -0.745
  • 0.00143
  • 0.0000204
  • 1.25E-7
  • ND
  • 3.69E-7
  • 0.00000136
  • 0.0000245
  • 3.57E-8
  • -0.0000926
  • 2.495
  • 0.05693
  • 0.00007093
  • ND
  • 0.003601
  • 0.003802
  • 0.01988
  • 0.00006242
  • -0.7426
  • 0.00548
  • 0.000197
  • 5.62E-7
  • ND
  • 0.0000493
  • 0.0000131
  • 0.000175
  • 6.6E-7
  • -0.00244
  • -0.0672
  • 0.00398
  • 0.0000316
  • ND
  • 0.000118
  • 0.000265
  • 0.0048
  • 0.00000442
  • -0.125

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Use
B1
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 6.58E-8
  • 4.2E-9
  • 7.26E-12
  • ND
  • 9.25E-10
  • 2.8E-10
  • 3.21E-9
  • 1.01E-11
  • -4.92E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 0.462
  • 0.107
  • 0.000377
  • ND
  • 0.0026
  • 0.0071
  • 0.155
  • 0.000129
  • -1.82
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 2.04E-11
  • 9.55E-12
  • 3.9E-14
  • ND
  • 3.71E-13
  • 6.37E-13
  • 1.78E-11
  • 1.15E-14
  • -1.19E-10
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 9.85E-10
  • 5.07E-10
  • 2.15E-12
  • ND
  • 5.87E-12
  • 3.38E-11
  • 1.21E-9
  • 2.64E-13
  • -5.87E-9
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.0825
  • 0.00103
  • 0.0000029
  • ND
  • 0.0000209
  • 0.0000689
  • 0.00226
  • 9.63E-7
  • 0.0268
Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 3.46
  • 0.484
  • 0.00101
  • ND
  • 0.0033
  • 0.0323
  • 0.519
  • 0.00302
  • -2.16